Version 2.6.10
0
43
FairA simple yet functional GraphQL client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 338.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Apollo-client vs Urql
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Urql
39.6 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Apollo-client
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Urql
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Apollo-client
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Urql
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 5.0.1
0
67
GoodA highly customizable and versatile GraphQL client for React
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 39.6 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Apollo-client and Urql? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Apollo-client and Urql both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Bundle Size
Urql has the smallest gzipped bundle at 39.6 KB. Apollo-client comes in at 338.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Urql has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Apollo-client has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Apollo-client if you value strong security track record. Choose Urql if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Apollo-client and Urql are solid choices for JavaScript development. Urql has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is apollo-client better than urql?
- It depends on your needs. Apollo-client has a health score of 43/100 while Urql scores 67/100. Apollo-client has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, apollo-client or urql?
- Urql has the smaller gzipped bundle at 39.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use apollo-client vs urql?
- Based on npm download statistics, Apollo-client has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Urql has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, apollo-client or urql?
- Urql currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Apollo-client has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Urql scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.