Version 3.13.0
0
57
FairProduction ready GraphQL Server
- Weekly Downloads
- 223.6K
↓14%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 7.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Apollo-server vs Trpc
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Apollo-server leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
Version 0.11.3
0
47
FairTypeScript-first toolkit for building RPC APIs
- Weekly Downloads
- 546
↓49%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 22.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
30
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Apollo-server and Trpc? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Apollo-server leads with 223.6K weekly downloads — roughly 409.5x more. Trpc has 546 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Apollo-server has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.8 KB. Trpc comes in at 22.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Apollo-server has an overall health score of 57/100 (moderate), with strong security, popularity scores. Trpc has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Apollo-server if you value strong security track record. Choose Trpc if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Apollo-server and Trpc are solid choices for JavaScript development. Apollo-server has the edge in overall health score (57/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is apollo-server better than trpc?
- It depends on your needs. Apollo-server has a health score of 57/100 while Trpc scores 47/100. Apollo-server has more weekly downloads (223.6K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, apollo-server or trpc?
- Apollo-server has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.8 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use apollo-server vs trpc?
- Based on npm download statistics, Apollo-server has approximately 223.6K weekly downloads and Trpc has approximately 546 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, apollo-server or trpc?
- Apollo-server currently has the higher overall health score at 57/100. Apollo-server has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Trpc scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.