Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from the Can I Use website
- Weekly Downloads
- 60.7M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 59.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Smallest Bundle
Lightningcss
3.7 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Lightningcss
77.1M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Autoprefixer
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Autoprefixer
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Lightningcss
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules using values from the Can I Use website
A CSS parser, transformer, and minifier written in Rust
Choosing between Autoprefixer and Lightningcss? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Lightningcss leads with 77.1M weekly downloads — roughly 1.3x more. Autoprefixer has 60.7M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Lightningcss has the smallest gzipped bundle at 3.7 KB. Autoprefixer comes in at 59.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Autoprefixer has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Lightningcss has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Autoprefixer if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Lightningcss if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Autoprefixer and Lightningcss are solid choices for JavaScript development. Autoprefixer has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.