67
GoodAWS CDK Toolkit CLI, the command line tool for CDK apps
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 6.7 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Aws-cdk vs Serverless
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Serverless
11.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Serverless
1.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Aws-cdk
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Aws-cdk
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Serverless
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
Excellent[](https://serverless.com)
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.5M
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 11.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Aws-cdk and Serverless? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Serverless leads with 1.5M weekly downloads — roughly 1478820.0x more. Aws-cdk has 0 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Serverless has the smallest gzipped bundle at 11.2 KB. Aws-cdk comes in at 6.7 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Serverless has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Aws-cdk has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Aws-cdk if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Serverless if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Aws-cdk and Serverless are solid choices for JavaScript development. Serverless has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is aws-cdk better than serverless?
- It depends on your needs. Aws-cdk has a health score of 67/100 while Serverless scores 85/100. Serverless has more weekly downloads (1.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, aws-cdk or serverless?
- Serverless has the smaller gzipped bundle at 11.2 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use aws-cdk vs serverless?
- Based on npm download statistics, Aws-cdk has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Serverless has approximately 1.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, aws-cdk or serverless?
- Serverless currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Aws-cdk has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Serverless scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.