74
GoodBiome is a toolchain for the web: formatter, linter and more
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 217.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
@biomejs/biome vs Prettier
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
@biomejs/biome leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
67
GoodPrettier is an opinionated code formatter
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.8 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @biomejs/biome and Prettier? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@biomejs/biome and Prettier both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Bundle Size
@biomejs/biome has the smallest gzipped bundle at 217.0 KB. Prettier comes in at 2.8 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@biomejs/biome has an overall health score of 74/100 (good), with strong maintenance, quality, security scores. Prettier has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @biomejs/biome if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Prettier if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @biomejs/biome and Prettier are solid choices for JavaScript development. @biomejs/biome has the edge in overall health score (74/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @biomejs/biome better than prettier?
- It depends on your needs. @biomejs/biome has a health score of 74/100 while Prettier scores 67/100. @biomejs/biome has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @biomejs/biome or prettier?
- @biomejs/biome has the smaller gzipped bundle at 217.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @biomejs/biome vs prettier?
- Based on npm download statistics, @biomejs/biome has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Prettier has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @biomejs/biome or prettier?
- @biomejs/biome currently has the higher overall health score at 74/100. @biomejs/biome has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Prettier scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.