Version 5.76.5
0
85
ExcellentQueue for messages and jobs based on Redis
- Weekly Downloads
- 4.7M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 158.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Bullmq vs Inngest
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Inngest
50.0 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Bullmq
4.7M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Bullmq
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Bullmq
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Bullmq
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 4.2.6
0
83
ExcellentOfficial SDK for Inngest.com. Inngest is the reliability layer for modern applications. Inngest combines durable execution, events, and queues into a zero-infra platform with built-in observability.
- Weekly Downloads
- 903.9K
↑6%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 50.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
90
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Bullmq and Inngest? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Bullmq leads with 4.7M weekly downloads — roughly 5.2x more. Inngest has 903.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Inngest has the smallest gzipped bundle at 50.0 KB. Bullmq comes in at 158.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Bullmq has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Inngest has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Bullmq if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Inngest if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Bullmq and Inngest are solid choices for JavaScript development. Bullmq has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is bullmq better than inngest?
- It depends on your needs. Bullmq has a health score of 85/100 while Inngest scores 83/100. Bullmq has more weekly downloads (4.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, bullmq or inngest?
- Inngest has the smaller gzipped bundle at 50.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use bullmq vs inngest?
- Based on npm download statistics, Bullmq has approximately 4.7M weekly downloads and Inngest has approximately 903.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, bullmq or inngest?
- Bullmq currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Bullmq has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Inngest scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.