67
GoodTerminal string styling done right
- Weekly Downloads
- 400.0M
↓9%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Chalk vs Picocolors
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Picocolors
383.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Chalk
400.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Chalk
40/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Chalk
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Chalk
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
61
GoodThe tiniest and the fastest library for terminal output formatting with ANSI colors
- Weekly Downloads
- 178.6M
↑17%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 383.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Chalk and Picocolors? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Chalk leads with 400.0M weekly downloads — roughly 2.2x more. Picocolors has 178.6M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Picocolors has the smallest gzipped bundle at 383.0 B. Chalk comes in at 2.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Chalk has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Picocolors has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Chalk if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Picocolors if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Chalk and Picocolors are solid choices for JavaScript development. Chalk has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is chalk better than picocolors?
- It depends on your needs. Chalk has a health score of 67/100 while Picocolors scores 61/100. Chalk has more weekly downloads (400.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, chalk or picocolors?
- Picocolors has the smaller gzipped bundle at 383.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use chalk vs picocolors?
- Based on npm download statistics, Chalk has approximately 400.0M weekly downloads and Picocolors has approximately 178.6M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, chalk or picocolors?
- Chalk currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Chalk has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Picocolors scores 20/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.