Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Cloudinary vs Imgix

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for Cloudinary vs Imgix

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Imgix

402.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Cloudinary

0 weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Cloudinary

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Cloudinary

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Imgix

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

Version 2.10.1

0
67
Good

Upload, transform, optimize, and manage images and videos with Cloudinary from Node.js.

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
58.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
imgix icon

imgix

Niche

Version 0.0.2

0
43
Fair

Imgix signature calculation

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
402.0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Cloudinary and Imgix? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Cloudinary and Imgix both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Imgix has the smallest gzipped bundle at 402.0 B. Cloudinary comes in at 58.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Cloudinary has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Imgix has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Cloudinary if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Imgix if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Cloudinary and Imgix are solid choices for JavaScript development. Cloudinary has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is cloudinary better than imgix?
It depends on your needs. Cloudinary has a health score of 67/100 while Imgix scores 43/100. Cloudinary has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, cloudinary or imgix?
Imgix has the smaller gzipped bundle at 402.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use cloudinary vs imgix?
Based on npm download statistics, Cloudinary has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Imgix has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, cloudinary or imgix?
Cloudinary currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Cloudinary has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Imgix scores 20/100 on maintenance.

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.