Contentlayer vs Next-mdx-remote

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

contentlayer

Moderate

Version 0.3.4

53
Fair
Weekly Downloads
19.4K
Bundle (gzip)
4.7 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

next-mdx-remote

Popular

Version 6.0.0

81
Excellent

utilities for loading mdx from any remote source as data, rather than as a local import

Weekly Downloads
411.8K
Bundle (gzip)
31.2 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Contentlayer and Next-mdx-remote? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Next-mdx-remote leads with 411.8K weekly downloads — roughly 21.3x more. Contentlayer has 19.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Contentlayer has the smallest gzipped bundle at 4.7 KB. Next-mdx-remote comes in at 31.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Next-mdx-remote has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Contentlayer has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Contentlayer if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Next-mdx-remote if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Contentlayer and Next-mdx-remote are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next-mdx-remote has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is contentlayer better than next-mdx-remote?
It depends on your needs. Contentlayer has a health score of 53/100 while Next-mdx-remote scores 81/100. Next-mdx-remote has more weekly downloads (411.8K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, contentlayer or next-mdx-remote?
Contentlayer has the smaller gzipped bundle at 4.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use contentlayer vs next-mdx-remote?
Based on npm download statistics, Contentlayer has approximately 19.4K weekly downloads and Next-mdx-remote has approximately 411.8K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, contentlayer or next-mdx-remote?
Next-mdx-remote currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Contentlayer has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Next-mdx-remote scores 100/100 on maintenance.