79
GoodCSV parsing implementing the Node.js `stream.Transform` API
- Weekly Downloads
- 11.6M
↓7%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 7.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Csv-parse vs Papaparse
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Csv-parse leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
67
GoodFast and powerful CSV parser for the browser that supports web workers and streaming large files. Converts CSV to JSON and JSON to CSV.
- Weekly Downloads
- 10.9M
↑11%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 77.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Csv-parse and Papaparse? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Csv-parse leads with 11.6M weekly downloads — roughly 1.1x more. Papaparse has 10.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Csv-parse has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.0 KB. Papaparse comes in at 77.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Csv-parse has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Papaparse has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Csv-parse if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Papaparse if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Csv-parse and Papaparse are solid choices for JavaScript development. Csv-parse has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is csv-parse better than papaparse?
- It depends on your needs. Csv-parse has a health score of 79/100 while Papaparse scores 67/100. Csv-parse has more weekly downloads (11.6M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, csv-parse or papaparse?
- Csv-parse has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.0 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use csv-parse vs papaparse?
- Based on npm download statistics, Csv-parse has approximately 11.6M weekly downloads and Papaparse has approximately 10.9M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, csv-parse or papaparse?
- Csv-parse currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Csv-parse has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Papaparse scores 40/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.