Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 3.0.0
Collision-resistant ids optimized for horizontal scaling and performance. For node and browsers.
Version 5.1.6
A tiny (118 bytes), secure URL-friendly unique string ID generator
Choosing between Cuid and Nanoid? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Nanoid leads with 112.4M weekly downloads — roughly 177.0x more. Cuid has 635.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Nanoid has the smallest gzipped bundle at 3.6 KB. Cuid comes in at 8.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Nanoid has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Cuid has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Cuid if you value strong security track record. Choose Nanoid if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Cuid and Nanoid are solid choices for JavaScript development. Nanoid has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.