83
ExcellentdaisyUI 5 - The Tailwind CSS Component Library
- Weekly Downloads
- 723.1K
↓15%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 128.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
90
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Daisyui vs Flowbite
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Flowbite
28.8 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Daisyui
723.1K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Daisyui
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Flowbite
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Flowbite
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
90
ExcellentThe most popular library of interactive components built with Tailwind CSS
- Weekly Downloads
- 591.8K
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 28.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
90
Quality
80
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Daisyui and Flowbite? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Daisyui leads with 723.1K weekly downloads — roughly 1.2x more. Flowbite has 591.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Flowbite has the smallest gzipped bundle at 28.8 KB. Daisyui comes in at 128.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Flowbite has an overall health score of 90/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Daisyui has an overall health score of 83/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Daisyui if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Flowbite if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Daisyui and Flowbite are solid choices for JavaScript development. Flowbite has the edge in overall health score (90/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is daisyui better than flowbite?
- It depends on your needs. Daisyui has a health score of 83/100 while Flowbite scores 90/100. Daisyui has more weekly downloads (723.1K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, daisyui or flowbite?
- Flowbite has the smaller gzipped bundle at 28.8 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use daisyui vs flowbite?
- Based on npm download statistics, Daisyui has approximately 723.1K weekly downloads and Flowbite has approximately 591.8K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, daisyui or flowbite?
- Flowbite currently has the higher overall health score at 90/100. Daisyui has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Flowbite scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.