85
ExcellentModern JavaScript date utility library
- Weekly Downloads
- 81.8M
↑19%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 17.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Date-fns vs Luxon
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Date-fns leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
67
GoodImmutable date wrapper
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.7M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 21.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Date-fns and Luxon? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Date-fns leads with 81.8M weekly downloads — roughly 2.9x more. Luxon has 28.7M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Date-fns has the smallest gzipped bundle at 17.1 KB. Luxon comes in at 21.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Date-fns has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Luxon has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Date-fns if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Luxon if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Date-fns and Luxon are solid choices for JavaScript development. Date-fns has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is date-fns better than luxon?
- It depends on your needs. Date-fns has a health score of 85/100 while Luxon scores 67/100. Date-fns has more weekly downloads (81.8M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, date-fns or luxon?
- Date-fns has the smaller gzipped bundle at 17.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use date-fns vs luxon?
- Based on npm download statistics, Date-fns has approximately 81.8M weekly downloads and Luxon has approximately 28.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, date-fns or luxon?
- Date-fns currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Date-fns has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Luxon scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.