Version 4.1.0
0
67
GoodModern JavaScript date utility library
- Weekly Downloads
- 66.4M
↑10%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 6.5 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Date-fns vs Luxon
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Luxon
1.3 MB gzipped
Most Popular
Date-fns
66.4M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Date-fns
40/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Date-fns
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Luxon
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 3.7.2
0
67
GoodImmutable date wrapper
- Weekly Downloads
- 25.4M
↓4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.3 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Date-fns and Luxon? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Date-fns leads with 66.4M weekly downloads — roughly 2.6x more. Luxon has 25.4M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Luxon has the smallest gzipped bundle at 1.3 MB. Date-fns comes in at 6.5 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Date-fns has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Luxon has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Date-fns if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Luxon if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Date-fns and Luxon are solid choices for JavaScript development. Date-fns has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is date-fns better than luxon?
- It depends on your needs. Date-fns has a health score of 67/100 while Luxon scores 67/100. Date-fns has more weekly downloads (66.4M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, date-fns or luxon?
- Luxon has the smaller gzipped bundle at 1.3 MB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use date-fns vs luxon?
- Based on npm download statistics, Date-fns has approximately 66.4M weekly downloads and Luxon has approximately 25.4M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, date-fns or luxon?
- Date-fns currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Date-fns has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Luxon scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.