Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Date-fns vs Luxon

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for Date-fns vs Luxon

Quick Verdict

Date-fns leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

Version 4.4.0

0
61
Good

Modern JavaScript date utility library

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
17.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
luxon icon

luxon

Niche

Version 3.7.2

0
49
Fair

Immutable date wrapper

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
21.4 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Date-fns and Luxon? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Date-fns and Luxon both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Date-fns has the smallest gzipped bundle at 17.1 KB. Luxon comes in at 21.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Date-fns has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Luxon has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Date-fns if you value strong security track record. Choose Luxon if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Date-fns and Luxon are solid choices for JavaScript development. Date-fns has the edge in overall health score (61/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is date-fns better than luxon?
It depends on your needs. Date-fns has a health score of 61/100 while Luxon scores 49/100. Date-fns has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, date-fns or luxon?
Date-fns has the smaller gzipped bundle at 17.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use date-fns vs luxon?
Based on npm download statistics, Date-fns has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Luxon has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, date-fns or luxon?
Date-fns currently has the higher overall health score at 61/100. Date-fns has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Luxon scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.