Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Electron vs Tauri

Electron bundles Chromium (80-200 MB). Tauri uses native WebView (2-10 MB). Compare bundle size, performance, cross-platform support, and mobile readiness.

Hero image for Electron vs Tauri

Quick Verdict

Electron leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

  1. electron

    Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS

    9.6M weekly downloads · 555.0 B gzip · Health 85/100

    0
  2. tauri

    Multi-binding collection of libraries and templates for building Tauri apps

    1.4K weekly downloads · 2.8 MB gzip · Health 67/100

    0

Choosing between Electron and Tauri? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Electron leads with 9.6M weekly downloads — roughly 6948.6x more. Tauri has 1.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Electron has the smallest gzipped bundle at 555.0 B. Tauri comes in at 2.8 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Electron has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Tauri has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Electron if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Tauri if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Electron and Tauri are solid choices for JavaScript development. Electron has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is electron better than tauri?
It depends on your needs. Electron has a health score of 85/100 while Tauri scores 67/100. Electron has more recorded weekly downloads (9.6M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, electron or tauri?
Electron has the smaller gzipped bundle at 555.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use electron vs tauri?
Electron has more recorded weekly downloads (9.6M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, electron or tauri?
Electron has a maintenance score of 100/100. Electron scores 100/100 and Tauri scores 80/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.