Version 11.14.0
0
61
Good> Simple styling in React.
- Weekly Downloads
- 15.6M
↑17%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 7.9 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
@emotion/react vs Styled-components
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
@emotion/react
7.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
@emotion/react
15.6M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Styled-components
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@emotion/react
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@emotion/react
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 6.3.12
0
85
ExcellentCSS for the <Component> Age. Style components your way with speed, strong typing, and flexibility.
- Weekly Downloads
- 8.8M
↑13%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 11.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @emotion/react and Styled-components? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@emotion/react leads with 15.6M weekly downloads — roughly 1.8x more. Styled-components has 8.8M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
@emotion/react has the smallest gzipped bundle at 7.9 KB. Styled-components comes in at 11.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Styled-components has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. @emotion/react has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @emotion/react if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Styled-components if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @emotion/react and Styled-components are solid choices for JavaScript development. Styled-components has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @emotion/react better than styled-components?
- It depends on your needs. @emotion/react has a health score of 61/100 while Styled-components scores 85/100. @emotion/react has more weekly downloads (15.6M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @emotion/react or styled-components?
- @emotion/react has the smaller gzipped bundle at 7.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @emotion/react vs styled-components?
- Based on npm download statistics, @emotion/react has approximately 15.6M weekly downloads and Styled-components has approximately 8.8M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @emotion/react or styled-components?
- Styled-components currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @emotion/react has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Styled-components scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.