79
GoodAn extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier.
- Weekly Downloads
- 229.1M
↑28%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 43.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Esbuild vs Swc
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Swc
129.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Esbuild
229.1M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Esbuild
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Esbuild
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Esbuild
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
59
FairAlias for @swc/cli
- Weekly Downloads
- 17.9K
↑4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 129.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Esbuild and Swc? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Esbuild leads with 229.1M weekly downloads — roughly 12793.2x more. Swc has 17.9K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Swc has the smallest gzipped bundle at 129.0 B. Esbuild comes in at 43.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Esbuild has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Swc has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Esbuild if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Swc if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Esbuild and Swc are solid choices for JavaScript development. Esbuild has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is esbuild better than swc?
- It depends on your needs. Esbuild has a health score of 79/100 while Swc scores 59/100. Esbuild has more weekly downloads (229.1M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, esbuild or swc?
- Swc has the smaller gzipped bundle at 129.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use esbuild vs swc?
- Based on npm download statistics, Esbuild has approximately 229.1M weekly downloads and Swc has approximately 17.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, esbuild or swc?
- Esbuild currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Esbuild has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Swc scores 40/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.