eslint
Version 10.0.2
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
- Weekly Downloads
- 100.8M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 846.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 10.0.2
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
Version 1.50.0
Linter for the JavaScript Oxidation Compiler
Choosing between Eslint and Oxlint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Eslint leads with 100.8M weekly downloads — roughly 52.2x more. Oxlint has 1.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Oxlint has the smallest gzipped bundle at 198.0 B. Eslint comes in at 846.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Oxlint has an overall health score of 92/100 (excellent), with strong maintenance, quality, security, popularity scores. Eslint has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Eslint if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Oxlint if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Eslint and Oxlint are solid choices for JavaScript development. Oxlint has the edge in overall health score (92/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.