filepond
FilePond, Where files go to stretch their bits.
263.7K weekly downloads · 33.1 KB gzip · Health 81/100
0
Comparison guide
Filepond vs Uppy
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Filepond leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
uppy
Extensible JavaScript file upload widget with support for drag&drop, resumable uploads, previews, restrictions, file processing/encoding, remote providers like Dropbox, Google Drive, S3 and more :dog:
37.8K weekly downloads · 155.8 KB gzip · Health 77/100
0
Choosing between Filepond and Uppy? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Filepond leads with 263.7K weekly downloads — roughly 7.0x more. Uppy has 37.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Filepond has the smallest gzipped bundle at 33.1 KB. Uppy comes in at 155.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Filepond has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Uppy has an overall health score of 77/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Filepond if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Uppy if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Filepond and Uppy are solid choices for JavaScript development. Filepond has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is filepond better than uppy?
- It depends on your needs. Filepond has a health score of 81/100 while Uppy scores 77/100. Filepond has more recorded weekly downloads (263.7K). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, filepond or uppy?
- Filepond has the smaller gzipped bundle at 33.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use filepond vs uppy?
- Filepond has more recorded weekly downloads (263.7K). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, filepond or uppy?
- Filepond has a maintenance score of 100/100. Filepond scores 100/100 and Uppy scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.