Skip to main content

Filepond vs Uppy

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

filepond

Popular

Version 4.32.12

81
Excellent

FilePond, Where files go to stretch their bits.

Weekly Downloads
187.5K
↓18%
Bundle (gzip)
351.9 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

uppy

Moderate

Version 5.2.3

71
Good

Extensible JavaScript file upload widget with support for drag&drop, resumable uploads, previews, restrictions, file processing/encoding, remote providers like Instagram, Dropbox, Google Drive, S3 and more :dog:

Weekly Downloads
24.8K
2%Stable
Bundle (gzip)
1.6 MB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Filepond and Uppy? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Filepond leads with 187.5K weekly downloads — roughly 7.6x more. Uppy has 24.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Filepond has the smallest gzipped bundle at 351.9 KB. Uppy comes in at 1.6 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Filepond has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Uppy has an overall health score of 71/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Filepond if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Uppy if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Filepond and Uppy are solid choices for JavaScript development. Filepond has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is filepond better than uppy?
It depends on your needs. Filepond has a health score of 81/100 while Uppy scores 71/100. Filepond has more weekly downloads (187.5K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, filepond or uppy?
Filepond has the smaller gzipped bundle at 351.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use filepond vs uppy?
Based on npm download statistics, Filepond has approximately 187.5K weekly downloads and Uppy has approximately 24.8K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, filepond or uppy?
Filepond currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Filepond has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Uppy scores 80/100 on maintenance.

Stay Updated

Get the latest package insights, npm trends, and tooling tips delivered to your inbox.