63
GoodA fast story book powered by Vite
- Weekly Downloads
- 105.4K
↓8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 64.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Histoire vs Ladle vs Storybook-8
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Most Popular
Histoire
105.4K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Ladle
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Histoire
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Ladle
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
63
GoodNode.js implementation of RabbitMQ's shovel client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 134
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
20
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Histoire and Ladle? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Histoire leads with 105.4K weekly downloads — roughly 786.2x more. Ladle has 134 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Ladle has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Histoire comes in at 64.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Histoire has an overall health score of 63/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Ladle has an overall health score of 63/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Histoire if you value strong security track record. Choose Ladle if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Histoire and Ladle are solid choices for JavaScript development. Histoire has the edge in overall health score (63/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is histoire better than ladle?
- It depends on your needs. Histoire has a health score of 63/100 while Ladle scores 63/100. Histoire has more weekly downloads (105.4K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, histoire or ladle?
- Ladle has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use histoire vs ladle?
- Based on npm download statistics, Histoire has approximately 105.4K weekly downloads and Ladle has approximately 134 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, histoire or ladle?
- Histoire currently has the higher overall health score at 63/100. Histoire has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Ladle scores 80/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.