@huggingface/transformers
State-of-the-art Machine Learning for the web. Run 🤗 Transformers directly in your browser, with no need for a server!
4.1M weekly downloads · 161.2 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Comparison guide
@huggingface/transformers vs Onnxruntime-web
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Onnxruntime-web
105.9 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Onnxruntime-web
5.9M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@huggingface/transformers
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@huggingface/transformers
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Onnxruntime-web
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
onnxruntime-web
A Javascript library for running ONNX models on browsers
5.9M weekly downloads · 105.9 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between @huggingface/transformers and Onnxruntime-web? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Onnxruntime-web leads with 5.9M weekly downloads — roughly 1.5x more. @huggingface/transformers has 4.1M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Onnxruntime-web has the smallest gzipped bundle at 105.9 KB. @huggingface/transformers comes in at 161.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@huggingface/transformers has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Onnxruntime-web has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @huggingface/transformers if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Onnxruntime-web if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @huggingface/transformers and Onnxruntime-web are solid choices for JavaScript development. @huggingface/transformers has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @huggingface/transformers better than onnxruntime-web?
- It depends on your needs. @huggingface/transformers has a health score of 85/100 while Onnxruntime-web scores 85/100. Onnxruntime-web has more recorded weekly downloads (5.9M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @huggingface/transformers or onnxruntime-web?
- Onnxruntime-web has the smaller gzipped bundle at 105.9 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @huggingface/transformers vs onnxruntime-web?
- Onnxruntime-web has more recorded weekly downloads (5.9M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, @huggingface/transformers or onnxruntime-web?
- @huggingface/transformers has a maintenance score of 100/100. @huggingface/transformers scores 100/100 and Onnxruntime-web scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.