hugo
Yet another node.js interface for philips hue
Downloads unavailable · 318.0 B gzip · Health 43/100
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Yet another node.js interface for philips hue
Downloads unavailable · 318.0 B gzip · Health 43/100
Choosing between Hugo and Next? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Weekly download data is unavailable for Hugo. Weekly download data is unavailable for Next. Missing data is not zero downloads. We cannot compare download activity until all counts are available.
Hugo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 318.0 B. Next comes in at 55.0 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Next has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Hugo has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics. Download data is incomplete; these composite scores include a fallback popularity input and should not determine an overall winner.
Choose Hugo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Next if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Download data is incomplete for this comparison of Hugo and Next. We are not selecting an overall winner from incomplete metrics. Compare the available bundle, maintenance, and quality information against your project's requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.