Delightful JavaScript Testing.
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Smallest Bundle
Jest
2.0 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Jest
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Mocha
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Jest
80/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Jest
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Delightful JavaScript Testing.
Trend data unavailable
simple, flexible, fun test framework
Trend data unavailable
Choosing between Jest and Mocha? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Jest and Mocha both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Jest has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.0 KB. Mocha comes in at 65.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Mocha has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Jest has an overall health score of 62/100 (good), with strong quality, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Jest if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Mocha if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Jest and Mocha are solid choices for JavaScript development. Mocha has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.