Jose vs Jsonwebtoken

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

jose

Extremely Popular

Version 6.1.3

79
Good

JWA, JWS, JWE, JWT, JWK, JWKS for Node.js, Browser, Cloudflare Workers, Deno, Bun, and other Web-interoperable runtimes

Weekly Downloads
44.8M
Bundle (gzip)
16.9 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

jsonwebtoken

Extremely Popular

Version 9.0.3

79
Good

JSON Web Token implementation (symmetric and asymmetric)

Weekly Downloads
34.7M
Bundle (gzip)
15.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Jose and Jsonwebtoken? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Jose leads with 44.8M weekly downloads — roughly 1.3x more. Jsonwebtoken has 34.7M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Jsonwebtoken has the smallest gzipped bundle at 15.6 KB. Jose comes in at 16.9 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Jose has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Jsonwebtoken has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Jose if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Jsonwebtoken if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Jose and Jsonwebtoken are solid choices for JavaScript development. Jose has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is jose better than jsonwebtoken?
It depends on your needs. Jose has a health score of 79/100 while Jsonwebtoken scores 79/100. Jose has more weekly downloads (44.8M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, jose or jsonwebtoken?
Jsonwebtoken has the smaller gzipped bundle at 15.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use jose vs jsonwebtoken?
Based on npm download statistics, Jose has approximately 44.8M weekly downloads and Jsonwebtoken has approximately 34.7M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, jose or jsonwebtoken?
Jose currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Jose has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Jsonwebtoken scores 80/100 on maintenance.