ladle
Version 0.0.0
Node.js implementation of RabbitMQ's shovel client.
- Weekly Downloads
- 290
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 0.0.0
Node.js implementation of RabbitMQ's shovel client.
Version 1.0.0
🚫 Placeholder to prevent dependency confusion.
Choosing between Ladle and Styleguidist? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Ladle leads with 290 weekly downloads — roughly 6.9x more. Styleguidist has 42 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Ladle has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Styleguidist comes in at 390.0 B. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Styleguidist has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Ladle has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Ladle if you value strong security track record. Choose Styleguidist if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Both Ladle and Styleguidist are solid choices for JavaScript development. Styleguidist has the edge in overall health score (49/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.