langchain
Version 1.2.28
Typescript bindings for langchain
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.9M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 791.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 1.2.28
Typescript bindings for langchain
Version 0.12.1
<p align="center"> <img height="100" width="100" alt="LlamaIndex logo" src="https://ts.llamaindex.ai/square.svg" /> </p> <h1 align="center">LlamaIndex.TS</h1> <h3 align="center"> Data framework for your LLM application. </h3>
Choosing between Langchain and Llamaindex? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Langchain leads with 1.9M weekly downloads — roughly 17.9x more. Llamaindex has 103.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Llamaindex has the smallest gzipped bundle at 285.3 KB. Langchain comes in at 791.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Langchain has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Llamaindex has an overall health score of 75/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Langchain if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Llamaindex if you value strong security track record.
Both Langchain and Llamaindex are solid choices for JavaScript development. Langchain has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.