Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Lerna vs Turborepo

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for Lerna vs Turborepo

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Turborepo

150.0 B gzipped

Most Popular

Lerna

0 weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Lerna

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Lerna

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Turborepo

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

lerna icon

lerna

Niche

Version 10.0.1

0
67
Good

Lerna is a fast, modern build system for managing and publishing multiple JavaScript/TypeScript packages from the same repository

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
178.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

turborepo

Niche

Version 0.0.1

0
49
Fair
Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
150.0 B
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
40
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Lerna and Turborepo? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Lerna and Turborepo both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Turborepo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. Lerna comes in at 178.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Lerna has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Turborepo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Lerna if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Turborepo if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Lerna and Turborepo are solid choices for JavaScript development. Lerna has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is lerna better than turborepo?
It depends on your needs. Lerna has a health score of 67/100 while Turborepo scores 49/100. Lerna has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, lerna or turborepo?
Turborepo has the smaller gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use lerna vs turborepo?
Based on npm download statistics, Lerna has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Turborepo has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, lerna or turborepo?
Lerna currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Lerna has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Turborepo scores 40/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

Nx vs Turborepo@changesets/cli vs Lerna

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.