Skip to main content

Nanoid vs Ulid

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Nanoid leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

nanoid icon

nanoid

Extremely Popular

Version 5.1.7

0
85
Excellent

A tiny (118 bytes), secure URL-friendly unique string ID generator

Weekly Downloads
144.5M
12%
Bundle (gzip)
3.7 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
ulid icon

ulid

Very Popular

Version 3.0.2

0
73
Good

A universally-unique, lexicographically-sortable, identifier generator

Weekly Downloads
6.4M
10%
Bundle (gzip)
20.3 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
60
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Nanoid and Ulid? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Nanoid leads with 144.5M weekly downloads — roughly 22.5x more. Ulid has 6.4M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Nanoid has the smallest gzipped bundle at 3.7 KB. Ulid comes in at 20.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Nanoid has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Ulid has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Nanoid if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Ulid if you value large community support, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Nanoid and Ulid are solid choices for JavaScript development. Nanoid has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is nanoid better than ulid?
It depends on your needs. Nanoid has a health score of 85/100 while Ulid scores 73/100. Nanoid has more weekly downloads (144.5M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, nanoid or ulid?
Nanoid has the smaller gzipped bundle at 3.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use nanoid vs ulid?
Based on npm download statistics, Nanoid has approximately 144.5M weekly downloads and Ulid has approximately 6.4M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, nanoid or ulid?
Nanoid currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Nanoid has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Ulid scores 60/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.