55
FairJavascript DSL for Classical Inheritance
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.5K
↑232%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Neon vs Supabase vs Turso
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Turso
2.2 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Supabase
2.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Supabase
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Neon
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Supabase
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
85
ExcellentSupabase CLI
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.0M
↑11%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 3.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
73
GoodTurso CLI - SQLite for production
- Weekly Downloads
- 2.1K
↑25%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Neon and Supabase and Turso? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Supabase leads with 2.0M weekly downloads — roughly 792.3x more. Neon has 2.5K weekly downloads. Turso has 2.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Neon has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Turso comes in at 2.2 KB. Supabase comes in at 3.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Supabase has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Turso has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Neon has an overall health score of 55/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Neon if you value strong security track record. Choose Supabase if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Turso if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Neon and Supabase and Turso are solid choices for JavaScript development. Supabase has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is neon better than supabase?
- It depends on your needs. Neon has a health score of 55/100 while Supabase scores 85/100. Supabase has more weekly downloads (2.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, neon or supabase?
- Neon has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use neon vs supabase?
- Based on npm download statistics, Neon has approximately 2.5K weekly downloads and Supabase has approximately 2.0M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, neon or supabase?
- Supabase currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Neon has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Supabase scores 100/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.