next-intl
Very Popular
Version 4.8.3
85
ExcellentInternationalization (i18n) for Next.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.9M
↑25%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 114.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Next-intl vs React-i18next
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
react-i18next
Very Popular
Version 16.5.6
85
ExcellentInternationalization for react done right. Using the i18next i18n ecosystem.
- Weekly Downloads
- 9.2M
↑15%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 263.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Next-intl and React-i18next? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
React-i18next leads with 9.2M weekly downloads — roughly 4.9x more. Next-intl has 1.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Next-intl has the smallest gzipped bundle at 114.4 KB. React-i18next comes in at 263.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Next-intl has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. React-i18next has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Next-intl if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose React-i18next if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Next-intl and React-i18next are solid choices for JavaScript development. Next-intl has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is next-intl better than react-i18next?
- It depends on your needs. Next-intl has a health score of 85/100 while React-i18next scores 85/100. React-i18next has more weekly downloads (9.2M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, next-intl or react-i18next?
- Next-intl has the smaller gzipped bundle at 114.4 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use next-intl vs react-i18next?
- Based on npm download statistics, Next-intl has approximately 1.9M weekly downloads and React-i18next has approximately 9.2M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, next-intl or react-i18next?
- Next-intl currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. Next-intl has a maintenance score of 100/100 and React-i18next scores 100/100 on maintenance.