nextra
Version 4.6.1
Next.js and MDX based site generator.
- Weekly Downloads
- 126.7K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 118.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 4.6.1
Next.js and MDX based site generator.
Version 1.6.4
Vite & Vue powered static site generator
Choosing between Nextra and Vitepress? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Vitepress leads with 378.4K weekly downloads — roughly 3.0x more. Nextra has 126.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Nextra has the smallest gzipped bundle at 118.2 KB. Vitepress comes in at 807.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Vitepress has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Nextra has an overall health score of 75/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Nextra if you value strong security track record. Choose Vitepress if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Nextra and Vitepress are solid choices for JavaScript development. Vitepress has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.