Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 0.31.0
<img alt="nivo" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plouc/nivo/master/nivo.png" width="216" height="68"/>
Version 37.3.6
Data viz for React
Choosing between Nivo and Victory? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Victory leads with 413.1K weekly downloads — roughly 146.8x more. Nivo has 2.8K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Nivo has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Victory comes in at 667.5 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Victory has an overall health score of 75/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Nivo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Nivo if you value strong security track record. Choose Victory if you value strong security track record.
Both Nivo and Victory are solid choices for JavaScript development. Victory has the edge in overall health score (75/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.