Skip to main content

@visx/visx vs Nivo

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

@visx/visx leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

@visx/visx icon

@visx/visx

Moderate

Version 3.12.0

0
67
Good

One stop install for all visx packages

Weekly Downloads
67.2K
10%
Bundle (gzip)
3.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
60
Popularity
70
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
nivo icon

nivo

Niche

Version 0.31.0

0
49
Fair

<img alt="nivo" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plouc/nivo/master/nivo.png" width="216" height="68"/>

Weekly Downloads
2.7K
5%
Bundle (gzip)
82.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
20
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @visx/visx and Nivo? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

@visx/visx leads with 67.2K weekly downloads — roughly 25.3x more. Nivo has 2.7K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

@visx/visx has the smallest gzipped bundle at 3.6 KB. Nivo comes in at 82.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

@visx/visx has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong security scores. Nivo has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @visx/visx if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Nivo if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @visx/visx and Nivo are solid choices for JavaScript development. @visx/visx has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @visx/visx better than nivo?
It depends on your needs. @visx/visx has a health score of 67/100 while Nivo scores 49/100. @visx/visx has more weekly downloads (67.2K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @visx/visx or nivo?
@visx/visx has the smaller gzipped bundle at 3.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @visx/visx vs nivo?
Based on npm download statistics, @visx/visx has approximately 67.2K weekly downloads and Nivo has approximately 2.7K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @visx/visx or nivo?
@visx/visx currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. @visx/visx has a maintenance score of 60/100 and Nivo scores 20/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.