Version 3.3.2
0
61
GoodA light-weight module that brings Fetch API to node.js
- Weekly Downloads
- 130.0M
2%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 31.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Node-fetch vs Superagent
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Node-fetch
31.4 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Node-fetch
130.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Superagent
60/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Node-fetch
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Node-fetch
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 10.3.0
0
73
Goodelegant & feature rich browser / node HTTP with a fluent API
- Weekly Downloads
- 18.5M
↓4%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 159.5 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Node-fetch and Superagent? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Node-fetch leads with 130.0M weekly downloads — roughly 7.0x more. Superagent has 18.5M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Node-fetch has the smallest gzipped bundle at 31.4 KB. Superagent comes in at 159.5 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Superagent has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Node-fetch has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Node-fetch if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Superagent if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Node-fetch and Superagent are solid choices for JavaScript development. Superagent has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is node-fetch better than superagent?
- It depends on your needs. Node-fetch has a health score of 61/100 while Superagent scores 73/100. Node-fetch has more weekly downloads (130.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, node-fetch or superagent?
- Node-fetch has the smaller gzipped bundle at 31.4 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use node-fetch vs superagent?
- Based on npm download statistics, Node-fetch has approximately 130.0M weekly downloads and Superagent has approximately 18.5M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, node-fetch or superagent?
- Superagent currently has the higher overall health score at 73/100. Node-fetch has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Superagent scores 60/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.