node-fetch
A light-weight module that brings Fetch API to node.js
206.5M weekly downloads · 22.6 KB gzip · Health 61/100
0
Comparison guide
Node-fetch vs Superagent
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Superagent
19.1 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Node-fetch
206.5M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Superagent
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Node-fetch
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Node-fetch
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
superagent
elegant & feature rich browser / node HTTP with a fluent API
23.6M weekly downloads · 19.1 KB gzip · Health 85/100
0
Choosing between Node-fetch and Superagent? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Node-fetch leads with 206.5M weekly downloads — roughly 8.8x more. Superagent has 23.6M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Superagent has the smallest gzipped bundle at 19.1 KB. Node-fetch comes in at 22.6 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Superagent has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Node-fetch has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Node-fetch if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Superagent if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Node-fetch and Superagent are solid choices for JavaScript development. Superagent has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is node-fetch better than superagent?
- It depends on your needs. Node-fetch has a health score of 61/100 while Superagent scores 85/100. Node-fetch has more recorded weekly downloads (206.5M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, node-fetch or superagent?
- Superagent has the smaller gzipped bundle at 19.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use node-fetch vs superagent?
- Node-fetch has more recorded weekly downloads (206.5M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
- Which is better maintained, node-fetch or superagent?
- Superagent has a maintenance score of 100/100. Node-fetch scores 20/100 and Superagent scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.