Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Onnxruntime-node vs Tensorflow

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for Onnxruntime-node vs Tensorflow

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

Tensorflow

23.7 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Onnxruntime-node

6.8M weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Onnxruntime-node

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

Onnxruntime-node

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Onnxruntime-node

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

  1. onnxruntime-node

    ONNXRuntime Node.js binding

    6.8M weekly downloads · 86.1 MB gzip · Health 85/100

    0
  2. tensorflow

    Node.js module for using TensorFlow graphs and models

    939 weekly downloads · 23.7 KB gzip · Health 47/100

    0

Choosing between Onnxruntime-node and Tensorflow? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Onnxruntime-node leads with 6.8M weekly downloads — roughly 7237.9x more. Tensorflow has 939 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

Tensorflow has the smallest gzipped bundle at 23.7 KB. Onnxruntime-node comes in at 86.1 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Onnxruntime-node has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Tensorflow has an overall health score of 47/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Onnxruntime-node if you value large community support, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Tensorflow if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Onnxruntime-node and Tensorflow are solid choices for JavaScript development. Onnxruntime-node has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is onnxruntime-node better than tensorflow?
It depends on your needs. Onnxruntime-node has a health score of 85/100 while Tensorflow scores 47/100. Onnxruntime-node has more recorded weekly downloads (6.8M). Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, onnxruntime-node or tensorflow?
Tensorflow has the smaller gzipped bundle at 23.7 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use onnxruntime-node vs tensorflow?
Onnxruntime-node has more recorded weekly downloads (6.8M). Download counts reflect package installations, not unique developers.
Which is better maintained, onnxruntime-node or tensorflow?
Onnxruntime-node has a maintenance score of 100/100. Onnxruntime-node scores 100/100 and Tensorflow scores 20/100 on maintenance.

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.