eslint
An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
Downloads unavailable · 370.4 KB gzip · Health 67/100
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

An AST-based pattern checker for JavaScript.
Downloads unavailable · 370.4 KB gzip · Health 67/100
Linter for the JavaScript Oxidation Compiler
Downloads unavailable · 180.0 B gzip · Health 74/100
Choosing between Eslint and Oxlint? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Weekly download data is unavailable for Eslint. Weekly download data is unavailable for Oxlint. Missing data is not zero downloads. We cannot compare download activity until all counts are available.
Oxlint has the smallest gzipped bundle at 180.0 B. Eslint comes in at 370.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Oxlint has an overall health score of 74/100 (good), with strong maintenance, quality, security scores. Eslint has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics. Download data is incomplete; these composite scores include a fallback popularity input and should not determine an overall winner.
Choose Eslint if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Oxlint if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Download data is incomplete for this comparison of Eslint and Oxlint. We are not selecting an overall winner from incomplete metrics. Compare the available bundle, maintenance, and quality information against your project's requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.