panda-css
Niche
Version 1.0.0
43
Faira lightweight css utility helper library
- Weekly Downloads
- 5
↑116%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 42.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Panda-css vs Vanilla-extract
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
vanilla-extract
Niche
Version
43
Fair- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Panda-css and Vanilla-extract? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Panda-css leads with 5 weekly downloads — roughly 5.0x more. Vanilla-extract has 0 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Vanilla-extract has the smallest gzipped bundle at 0 B. Panda-css comes in at 42.2 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Panda-css has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Vanilla-extract has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Panda-css if you value strong security track record. Choose Vanilla-extract if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Panda-css and Vanilla-extract are solid choices for JavaScript development. Panda-css has the edge in overall health score (43/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is panda-css better than vanilla-extract?
- It depends on your needs. Panda-css has a health score of 43/100 while Vanilla-extract scores 43/100. Panda-css has more weekly downloads (5), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, panda-css or vanilla-extract?
- Vanilla-extract has the smaller gzipped bundle at 0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use panda-css vs vanilla-extract?
- Based on npm download statistics, Panda-css has approximately 5 weekly downloads and Vanilla-extract has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, panda-css or vanilla-extract?
- Panda-css currently has the higher overall health score at 43/100. Panda-css has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Vanilla-extract scores 20/100 on maintenance.