Skip to main content

Comparison guide

Pino vs Winston

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Hero image for Pino vs Winston

Quick Verdict

Pino leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.

pino icon

pino

Niche

Version 10.3.1

0
67
Good

super fast, all natural json logger

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
1.4 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
winston icon

winston

Niche

Version 3.19.0

0
55
Fair

A logger for just about everything.

Weekly Downloads
0

Trend data unavailable

Bundle (gzip)
37.1 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
60
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between Pino and Winston? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Pino and Winston both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Pino has the smallest gzipped bundle at 1.4 KB. Winston comes in at 37.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Pino has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Winston has an overall health score of 55/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Pino if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Winston if you value strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both Pino and Winston are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pino has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pino better than winston?
It depends on your needs. Pino has a health score of 67/100 while Winston scores 55/100. Pino has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, pino or winston?
Pino has the smaller gzipped bundle at 1.4 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use pino vs winston?
Based on npm download statistics, Pino has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Winston has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, pino or winston?
Pino currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Pino has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Winston scores 60/100 on maintenance.

Related Comparisons

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.