Version 10.3.1
0
79
Goodsuper fast, all natural json logger
- Weekly Downloads
- 28.0M
↓5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 194.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Pino vs Winston
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Winston
80.5 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Pino
28.0M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Pino
80/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Pino
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Winston
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
Version 3.19.0
0
73
GoodA logger for just about everything.
- Weekly Downloads
- 21.9M
↓8%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 80.5 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
60
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Pino and Winston? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Pino leads with 28.0M weekly downloads — roughly 1.3x more. Winston has 21.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Winston has the smallest gzipped bundle at 80.5 KB. Pino comes in at 194.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Pino has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Winston has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Pino if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Winston if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Pino and Winston are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pino has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is pino better than winston?
- It depends on your needs. Pino has a health score of 79/100 while Winston scores 73/100. Pino has more weekly downloads (28.0M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, pino or winston?
- Winston has the smaller gzipped bundle at 80.5 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use pino vs winston?
- Based on npm download statistics, Pino has approximately 28.0M weekly downloads and Winston has approximately 21.9M weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, pino or winston?
- Pino currently has the higher overall health score at 79/100. Pino has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Winston scores 60/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.