playwright
Version 1.58.2
A high-level API to automate web browsers
- Weekly Downloads
- 31.9M
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.1 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 1.58.2
A high-level API to automate web browsers
Version 24.37.5
A high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol
Choosing between Playwright and Puppeteer? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Playwright leads with 31.9M weekly downloads — roughly 4.0x more. Puppeteer has 7.9M weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Puppeteer has the smallest gzipped bundle at 965.0 B. Playwright comes in at 1.1 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Playwright has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Puppeteer has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Playwright if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Puppeteer if you value large community support, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Playwright and Puppeteer are solid choices for JavaScript development. Playwright has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.