Fast, disk space efficient package manager
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1002.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Pnpm leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
Fast, disk space efficient package manager
Trend data unavailable
📦🐈 Fast, reliable, and secure dependency management.
Trend data unavailable
Choosing between Pnpm and Yarn? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Pnpm and Yarn both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Pnpm has the smallest gzipped bundle at 1002.0 B. Yarn comes in at 1.5 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Pnpm has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Yarn has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Pnpm if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Yarn if you value strong security track record.
Both Pnpm and Yarn are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pnpm has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.