pusher
Version 5.3.2
Node.js client to interact with the Pusher Channels REST API
- Weekly Downloads
- 402.1K
- Bundle (gzip)
- 40.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Version 5.3.2
Node.js client to interact with the Pusher Channels REST API
Version 4.8.3
node.js realtime framework server
Choosing between Pusher and Socket.io? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Socket.io leads with 11.1M weekly downloads — roughly 27.6x more. Pusher has 402.1K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Pusher has the smallest gzipped bundle at 40.8 KB. Socket.io comes in at 54.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Socket.io has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Pusher has an overall health score of 75/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Pusher if you value strong security track record. Choose Socket.io if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record.
Both Pusher and Socket.io are solid choices for JavaScript development. Socket.io has the edge in overall health score (79/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.