Node.js client to interact with the Pusher Channels REST API
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 41.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Pusher leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
Node.js client to interact with the Pusher Channels REST API
Trend data unavailable
node.js realtime framework server
Trend data unavailable
Choosing between Pusher and Socket.io? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Pusher and Socket.io both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Pusher has the smallest gzipped bundle at 41.0 KB. Socket.io comes in at 415.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Pusher has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Socket.io has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Pusher if you value strong security track record. Choose Socket.io if you value strong security track record.
Both Pusher and Socket.io are solid choices for JavaScript development. Pusher has the edge in overall health score (61/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.