node.js realtime framework server
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 54.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Smallest Bundle
Ws
240.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Socket.io
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Ws
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Socket.io
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Ws
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
node.js realtime framework server
Trend data unavailable
Simple to use, blazing fast and thoroughly tested websocket client and server for Node.js
Trend data unavailable
Choosing between Socket.io and Ws? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Socket.io and Ws both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Ws has the smallest gzipped bundle at 240.0 B. Socket.io comes in at 54.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Ws has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Socket.io has an overall health score of 49/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Socket.io if you value strong security track record. Choose Ws if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Socket.io and Ws are solid choices for JavaScript development. Ws has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.