qwik switch package with setLevel module
- Weekly Downloads
- 40
- Bundle (gzip)
- 703.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Comparison guide
Qwik and React compared for real app decisions: resumability, hydration cost, ecosystem depth, hiring, routing, and when a framework switch is worth it.

Smallest Bundle
Qwik
703.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
React
129.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
React
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Qwik
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
React
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
qwik switch package with setLevel module
React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
Choosing between Qwik and React? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
React leads with 129.3M weekly downloads — roughly 3233627.2x more. Qwik has 40 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Qwik has the smallest gzipped bundle at 703.0 B. React comes in at 2.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
React has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Qwik has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
Choose Qwik if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose React if you value massive community and ecosystem, minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Both Qwik and React are solid choices for JavaScript development. React has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Qwik and React solve frontend performance from opposite directions. React optimizes a large ecosystem around hydration, Server Components, compiler work, and mature routing/data frameworks. Qwik starts from resumability: the server serializes enough state that the browser can resume interactivity lazily instead of hydrating the full component tree up front.
That makes Qwik compelling for content-heavy or commerce pages where initial JavaScript cost is the bottleneck. The trade-off is ecosystem and hiring depth. React has more maintained packages, more production examples, and more developers who can debug complex app behavior quickly. Qwik has a smaller but focused ecosystem, so the technical win needs to justify the adoption cost.
Choose Qwik when you are optimizing first-load performance on pages with lots of mostly-idle components and your team is comfortable adopting a newer framework. Choose React when ecosystem maturity, team familiarity, library availability, and long-term maintainability matter more than squeezing every hydration byte out of the page.
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.