85
Excellent- Weekly Downloads
- 60.3M
↑5%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 26.8 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
@radix-ui/react-dialog vs Shadcn-ui
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Shadcn-ui
2.3 KB gzipped
Most Popular
@radix-ui/react-dialog
60.3M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
@radix-ui/react-dialog
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
@radix-ui/react-dialog
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
@radix-ui/react-dialog
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
57
FairAdd components to your apps.
- Weekly Downloads
- 150.6K
↓3%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.3 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between @radix-ui/react-dialog and Shadcn-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
@radix-ui/react-dialog leads with 60.3M weekly downloads — roughly 400.4x more. Shadcn-ui has 150.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Shadcn-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.3 KB. @radix-ui/react-dialog comes in at 26.8 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
@radix-ui/react-dialog has an overall health score of 85/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Shadcn-ui has an overall health score of 57/100 (moderate), with strong security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose @radix-ui/react-dialog if you value massive community and ecosystem, actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Shadcn-ui if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both @radix-ui/react-dialog and Shadcn-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. @radix-ui/react-dialog has the edge in overall health score (85/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is @radix-ui/react-dialog better than shadcn-ui?
- It depends on your needs. @radix-ui/react-dialog has a health score of 85/100 while Shadcn-ui scores 57/100. @radix-ui/react-dialog has more weekly downloads (60.3M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, @radix-ui/react-dialog or shadcn-ui?
- Shadcn-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.3 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use @radix-ui/react-dialog vs shadcn-ui?
- Based on npm download statistics, @radix-ui/react-dialog has approximately 60.3M weekly downloads and Shadcn-ui has approximately 150.6K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, @radix-ui/react-dialog or shadcn-ui?
- @radix-ui/react-dialog currently has the higher overall health score at 85/100. @radix-ui/react-dialog has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Shadcn-ui scores 20/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.