61
GoodDeprecated Rspack CLI
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 310.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Rspack vs Webpack
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Rspack
310.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Rspack
0 weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Webpack
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Rspack
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Rspack
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
67
GoodPacks ECMAScript/CommonJs/AMD modules for the browser. Allows you to split your codebase into multiple bundles, which can be loaded on demand. Supports loaders to preprocess files, i.e. json, jsx, es7, css, less, ... and your custom stuff.
- Weekly Downloads
- 0
Trend data unavailable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 993.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
10
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Rspack and Webpack? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Rspack and Webpack both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.
Bundle Size
Rspack has the smallest gzipped bundle at 310.0 B. Webpack comes in at 993.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Webpack has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Rspack has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Rspack if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Webpack if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Rspack and Webpack are solid choices for JavaScript development. Webpack has the edge in overall health score (67/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is rspack better than webpack?
- It depends on your needs. Rspack has a health score of 61/100 while Webpack scores 67/100. Rspack has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, rspack or webpack?
- Rspack has the smaller gzipped bundle at 310.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use rspack vs webpack?
- Based on npm download statistics, Rspack has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Webpack has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, rspack or webpack?
- Webpack currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Rspack has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Webpack scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.