79
Good- Weekly Downloads
- 12.8M
↑10%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 70.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Radix-ui vs Shadcn-ui
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Shadcn-ui
2.5 KB gzipped
Most Popular
Radix-ui
12.8M weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Shadcn-ui
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Radix-ui
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Radix-ui
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
81
ExcellentAdd components to your apps.
- Weekly Downloads
- 176.4K
1%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.5 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Radix-ui and Shadcn-ui? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Radix-ui leads with 12.8M weekly downloads — roughly 72.7x more. Shadcn-ui has 176.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Shadcn-ui has the smallest gzipped bundle at 2.5 KB. Radix-ui comes in at 70.1 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Shadcn-ui has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Radix-ui has an overall health score of 79/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Radix-ui if you value massive community and ecosystem, strong security track record. Choose Shadcn-ui if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Radix-ui and Shadcn-ui are solid choices for JavaScript development. Shadcn-ui has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is radix-ui better than shadcn-ui?
- It depends on your needs. Radix-ui has a health score of 79/100 while Shadcn-ui scores 81/100. Radix-ui has more weekly downloads (12.8M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, radix-ui or shadcn-ui?
- Shadcn-ui has the smaller gzipped bundle at 2.5 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use radix-ui vs shadcn-ui?
- Based on npm download statistics, Radix-ui has approximately 12.8M weekly downloads and Shadcn-ui has approximately 176.4K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, radix-ui or shadcn-ui?
- Shadcn-ui currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Radix-ui has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Shadcn-ui scores 100/100 on maintenance.
Related Comparisons
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.