enzyme
Very Popular
Version 3.11.0
61
GoodJavaScript Testing utilities for React
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.7M
↑11%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 270.4 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
100
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Enzyme vs Testing-library
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
testing-library
Moderate
Version 0.0.2
53
Fairwork
- Weekly Downloads
- 17.6K
↓26%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 474.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Enzyme and Testing-library? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Enzyme leads with 1.7M weekly downloads — roughly 95.9x more. Testing-library has 17.6K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Testing-library has the smallest gzipped bundle at 474.0 B. Enzyme comes in at 270.4 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Enzyme has an overall health score of 61/100 (good), with strong security, popularity scores. Testing-library has an overall health score of 53/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Enzyme if you value large community support, strong security track record. Choose Testing-library if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Enzyme and Testing-library are solid choices for JavaScript development. Enzyme has the edge in overall health score (61/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is enzyme better than testing-library?
- It depends on your needs. Enzyme has a health score of 61/100 while Testing-library scores 53/100. Enzyme has more weekly downloads (1.7M), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, enzyme or testing-library?
- Testing-library has the smaller gzipped bundle at 474.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use enzyme vs testing-library?
- Based on npm download statistics, Enzyme has approximately 1.7M weekly downloads and Testing-library has approximately 17.6K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, enzyme or testing-library?
- Enzyme currently has the higher overall health score at 61/100. Enzyme has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Testing-library scores 20/100 on maintenance.