Turbopack vs Vite

Downloads & Popularity

Turbopack and Vite both have 0 weekly downloads, indicating equal adoption in the ecosystem.

Bundle Size

Turbopack has the smallest gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. Vite comes in at 686.3 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Vite has an overall health score of 67/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Turbopack has an overall health score of 43/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose Turbopack if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Vite if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is turbopack better than vite?

It depends on your needs. Turbopack has a health score of 43/100 while Vite scores 67/100. Turbopack has more weekly downloads (0), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.

Which has a smaller bundle size, turbopack or vite?

Turbopack has the smaller gzipped bundle at 150.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.

How many developers use turbopack vs vite?

Based on npm download statistics, Turbopack has approximately 0 weekly downloads and Vite has approximately 0 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.

Which is better maintained, turbopack or vite?

Vite currently has the higher overall health score at 67/100. Turbopack has a maintenance score of 20/100 and Vite scores 100/100 on maintenance.