59
FairJavascript DSL for Classical Inheritance
- Weekly Downloads
- 14.3K
↑228%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 960.0 B
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
40
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Neon vs Planetscale vs Turso
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Smallest Bundle
Neon
960.0 B gzipped
Most Popular
Neon
14.3K weekly downloads
Best Maintained
Turso
100/100 maintenance score
Highest Quality
Neon
50/100 quality score
Overall Pick
Neon
Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality
45
FairA simple client for connecting to PlanetScale.
- Weekly Downloads
- 278
↓56%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 3.0 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
20
Popularity
20
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
73
GoodTurso CLI - SQLite for production
- Weekly Downloads
- 1.6K
↑61%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 2.2 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
40
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Neon and Planetscale and Turso? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Neon leads with 14.3K weekly downloads — roughly 9.1x more. Turso has 1.6K weekly downloads. Planetscale has 278 weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Neon has the smallest gzipped bundle at 960.0 B. Turso comes in at 2.2 KB. Planetscale comes in at 3.0 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Turso has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Neon has an overall health score of 59/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Planetscale has an overall health score of 45/100 (moderate), with strong security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Neon if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Planetscale if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Turso if you value minimal bundle footprint, actively maintained, strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Neon and Planetscale and Turso are solid choices for JavaScript development. Turso has the edge in overall health score (73/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is neon better than planetscale?
- It depends on your needs. Neon has a health score of 59/100 while Planetscale scores 45/100. Neon has more weekly downloads (14.3K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, neon or planetscale?
- Neon has the smaller gzipped bundle at 960.0 B. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use neon vs planetscale?
- Based on npm download statistics, Neon has approximately 14.3K weekly downloads and Planetscale has approximately 278 weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, neon or planetscale?
- Neon currently has the higher overall health score at 59/100. Neon has a maintenance score of 40/100 and Planetscale scores 20/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.