81
ExcellentFilePond, Where files go to stretch their bits.
- Weekly Downloads
- 221.7K
2%Stable
- Bundle (gzip)
- 33.1 KB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Comparison guide
Filepond vs Uppy
Side-by-side NPM package comparison
Quick Verdict
Filepond leads across all categories in this comparison. Check the detailed metrics below to see how each package performs for your specific needs.
71
GoodExtensible JavaScript file upload widget with support for drag&drop, resumable uploads, previews, restrictions, file processing/encoding, remote providers like Instagram, Dropbox, Google Drive, S3 and more :dog:
- Weekly Downloads
- 26.0K
↓15%
- Bundle (gzip)
- 1.6 MB
- Updated
- Vulns
- 0
Health Score Breakdown
Maintenance
80
Popularity
60
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
Choosing between Filepond and Uppy? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.
Downloads & Popularity
Filepond leads with 221.7K weekly downloads — roughly 8.5x more. Uppy has 26.0K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.
Bundle Size
Filepond has the smallest gzipped bundle at 33.1 KB. Uppy comes in at 1.6 MB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.
Health Score Comparison
Filepond has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. Uppy has an overall health score of 71/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.
When to Choose Each
Choose Filepond if you value actively maintained, strong security track record. Choose Uppy if you value strong security track record.
Our Verdict
Both Filepond and Uppy are solid choices for JavaScript development. Filepond has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is filepond better than uppy?
- It depends on your needs. Filepond has a health score of 81/100 while Uppy scores 71/100. Filepond has more weekly downloads (221.7K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
- Which has a smaller bundle size, filepond or uppy?
- Filepond has the smaller gzipped bundle at 33.1 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
- How many developers use filepond vs uppy?
- Based on npm download statistics, Filepond has approximately 221.7K weekly downloads and Uppy has approximately 26.0K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
- Which is better maintained, filepond or uppy?
- Filepond currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. Filepond has a maintenance score of 100/100 and Uppy scores 80/100 on maintenance.
The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet
One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.