Skip to main content

Comparison guide

@visx/visx vs Victory

Side-by-side NPM package comparison

Quick Verdict

Smallest Bundle

@visx/visx

3.6 KB gzipped

Most Popular

Victory

466.9K weekly downloads

Best Maintained

Victory

100/100 maintenance score

Highest Quality

@visx/visx

50/100 quality score

Overall Pick

Victory

Best all-around based on popularity, size, maintenance & quality

@visx/visx icon

@visx/visx

Moderate

Version 4.0.0

0
73
Good

One stop install for all visx packages

Weekly Downloads
85.4K
3%
Bundle (gzip)
3.6 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
80
Popularity
70
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70
victory icon

victory

Popular

Version 37.3.6

0
81
Excellent

Data viz for React

Weekly Downloads
466.9K
Stable
Bundle (gzip)
116.5 KB
Updated
Vulns
0

Health Score Breakdown

Maintenance
100
Popularity
80
Quality
50
Security
100
Stability
70

Choosing between @visx/visx and Victory? Here's a data-driven comparison based on real npm data — downloads, bundle size, health scores, and more — to help you decide which package fits your project best.

Downloads & Popularity

Victory leads with 466.9K weekly downloads — roughly 5.5x more. @visx/visx has 85.4K weekly downloads. Higher download counts generally indicate broader community adoption and a larger ecosystem of tutorials, plugins, and support.

Bundle Size

@visx/visx has the smallest gzipped bundle at 3.6 KB. Victory comes in at 116.5 KB. A smaller bundle size means faster page loads, which improves user experience and Core Web Vitals scores.

Health Score Comparison

Victory has an overall health score of 81/100 (very good), with strong maintenance, security, popularity scores. @visx/visx has an overall health score of 73/100 (good), with strong maintenance, security scores. Health scores are calculated from maintenance activity, code quality, security posture, popularity, and stability metrics.

When to Choose Each

Choose @visx/visx if you value minimal bundle footprint, strong security track record. Choose Victory if you value actively maintained, strong security track record.

Our Verdict

Both @visx/visx and Victory are solid choices for JavaScript development. Victory has the edge in overall health score (81/100), while each package brings unique strengths to the table. Evaluate them based on your project's priorities — whether that's community size, bundle efficiency, or maintenance activity — and choose the one that aligns best with your requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is @visx/visx better than victory?
It depends on your needs. @visx/visx has a health score of 73/100 while Victory scores 81/100. Victory has more weekly downloads (466.9K), suggesting broader adoption. Consider your specific requirements — bundle size, community support, and feature set — to decide which is the better fit.
Which has a smaller bundle size, @visx/visx or victory?
@visx/visx has the smaller gzipped bundle at 3.6 KB. A smaller bundle means faster load times for your users, which can positively impact SEO and user experience.
How many developers use @visx/visx vs victory?
Based on npm download statistics, @visx/visx has approximately 85.4K weekly downloads and Victory has approximately 466.9K weekly downloads. These numbers reflect package installations, not unique developers, but they indicate relative adoption levels.
Which is better maintained, @visx/visx or victory?
Victory currently has the higher overall health score at 81/100. @visx/visx has a maintenance score of 80/100 and Victory scores 100/100 on maintenance.

The 2026 JavaScript Stack Cheatsheet

One PDF: the best package for every category (ORMs, bundlers, auth, testing, state management). Used by 500+ devs. Free, updated monthly.